2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1974 Seat 133
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 133 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1974 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 133.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1974 Seat 133 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Tracker | 133 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2030 mm |