2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Ford Limited
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Limited. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Limited would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Limited is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Limited has automatic transmission and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Limited will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Ford Limited | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Limited |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2910 mm |