2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1989 Dodge Colt
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 1989 Dodge Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2400 mm |