2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1992 Mazda Eunos

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda Eunos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda Eunos (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda Eunos should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda Eunos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda Eunos (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda Eunos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. 1992 Mazda Eunos has automatic transmission and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Mazda Eunos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: