2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Toyota GT1
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota GT1 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Toyota GT1. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota GT1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota GT1. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota GT1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Toyota GT1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Tracker | GT1 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2810 mm |
