2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2001 Tata Aria
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Tata Aria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Tata Aria would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Tata Aria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Tata Aria (140 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Tata Aria should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Tata Aria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 2001 Tata Aria | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
| Model | Tracker | Aria |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
