2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Lada 111
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 111 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Lada 111. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 111.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 111. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Lada 111 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Tracker | 111 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2500 mm |