2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2005 Honda HR-V is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. Both 2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2005 Honda HR-V are equipped with a 1,590 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda HR-V (106 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda HR-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2005 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Honda HR-V. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | HR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |