2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (395 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (542 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
Make Chevrolet Chevrolet
Model Tracker TrailBlazer
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 5964 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 395 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 542 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2880 mm