2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Honda Civic

To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,202 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Civic (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Honda Civic
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Tracker Civic
Year Released 2003 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2202 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2630 mm