2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Citroen C3

To start off, 2008 Citroen C3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C3.

Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C3 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tracker 2008 Citroen C3
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Tracker C3
Year Released 2003 2008
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1398 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2470 mm