2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2009 Chevrolet Colorado

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado (186 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tracker 2009 Chevrolet Colorado
Make Chevrolet Chevrolet
Model Tracker Colorado
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2901 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 186 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2830 mm