2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Tata Indica
To start off, 2010 Tata Indica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Tata Indica. (70 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Indica.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Indica. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
| Model | Tracker | Indica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
