2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chevrolet Tracker 2011 Jeep Wrangler
Make Chevrolet Jeep
Model Tracker Wrangler
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 321 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4404 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1877 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2946 mm