2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1965 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1965 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1308 kg more than 1965 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1965 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | Familia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 792 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2200 mm |