2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1965 Morgan 4
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1965 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
Model | TrailBlazer | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |