2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | TrailBlazer | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |