2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1986 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1986 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1986 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1986 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | TrailBlazer | Ascona |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |