2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 915 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | TrailBlazer | 200 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |