2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | TrailBlazer | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |