2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport weights approximately 405 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport (285 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Trans Sport | CU-X |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2680 mm |