2003 Chrysler 300 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2003 Chrysler 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Chrysler 300. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 5 kg more than 2003 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler 300 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 300 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2734 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2960 mm |
