2003 Chrysler 300 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Chrysler 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,734 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler 300 (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler 300 (255 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler 300 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | 300 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2734 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |