2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 850 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Airflite | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Airflite | 102 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1115 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 341 Nm | 78 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2160 mm |
