2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 650 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Airflite | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Airflite | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 341 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 43 L |
