2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 735 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Airflite | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Airflite | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 341 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2420 mm |