2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (341 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Airflite | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Airflite | Etna |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 341 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2520 mm |
