2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Airflite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Airflite would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Bravo. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 165 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (361 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (341 Nm). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Airflite | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Airflite | Bravo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 341 Nm | 361 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 57 L |