2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Airflite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Airflite would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 250 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Airflite | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Airflite | Bravo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 341 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 58 L |