2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Airflite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Airflite would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 926 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Expedition (494 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (341 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Airflite | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Airflite | Expedition |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 341 Nm | 494 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2526 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 106 L |