2003 Chrysler Airflite vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Airflite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Airflite would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (341 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Airflite | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Airflite | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 341 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 55 L |