2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 468 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Concorde | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | Concorde | Munga |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 31 L |