2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 758 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Concorde | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Concorde | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |