2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1980 Zastava 750

To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 938 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 750. 2003 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: