2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 398 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Concorde | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Concorde | Celica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |
