2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Concorde. 2003 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1998 Honda SSM has manual transmission. 1998 Honda SSM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Concorde | 1998 Honda SSM | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Concorde | SSM |
Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |