2003 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Concorde | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Concorde | TT |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |