2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1948 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 530 kg more than 1948 Riley RM A.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1948 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chrysler | Riley |
Model | Grand Voyager | RM A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2870 mm |