2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (142 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 4 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |
