2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2004 Marcos TSO is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Marcos TSO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TSO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Marcos TSO | |
| Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
| Model | Grand Voyager | TSO |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 5667 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
