2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 640 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Grand Voyager | Almera |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 138 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |