2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (142 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Chrysler | Tata |
Model | Grand Voyager | Nano |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 73.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 37 L |