2003 Chrysler LHS vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000

To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 598 more horse power than 2003 Chrysler LHS. (246 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chrysler LHS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 549 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.

Because 2004 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 657 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler LHS. (333 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler LHS. 2003 Chrysler LHS has automatic transmission and 2004 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 2004 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chrysler LHS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: