2003 Chrysler LHS vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2003 Chrysler LHS. (246 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Chrysler LHS.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler LHS. (333 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler LHS | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | LHS | Calais |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 333 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |