2003 Chrysler Neon vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Neon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 215 kg more than 1959 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Neon | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | TR3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 29 L |
