2003 Chrysler Neon vs. 1968 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Luce weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1968 Mazda Luce is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Luce. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Neon (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Neon | 1968 Mazda Luce | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Neon | Luce |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 57 L |