2003 Chrysler Neon vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Neon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 929 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Neon. (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Neon | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Neon | 929 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2620 mm |