2003 Chrysler Neon vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 2003 Chrysler Neon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Neon (114 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 230 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Neon (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste has automatic transmission and 2003 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 2003 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: