2003 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica (253 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. 2003 Chrysler Pacifica has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chrysler Pacifica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: