2003 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica (254 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Pacifica | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Pacifica | Epica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |